Modern welfare was sold as compassion. In practice, it has become something far different: a machine that cannot distinguish between a person who is unable to work and a person who will not work.

The data confirms exactly what Scripture warns: when a system rewards dependency, dependency expands.

Scale and Scope of Welfare: A Huge, Impersonal Machine That Cannot Discern

SNAP delivers benefits to over 40 million people every month—that’s more than 22 million households, roughly one in eight Americans. At that size, the program stops being “charity” and becomes a conveyor belt.

It cannot see a man’s character. It cannot judge effort. It cannot distinguish between the diligent and the idle.

You may ask: “Is there not a way to do this?”

At the federal level, no, not in any meaningful sense. Government systems can check income, verify paperwork, and apply formulas. What they cannot do is discern moral reality. They cannot distinguish a man who is genuinely unable to work from a man who chooses not to labor. That requires proximity, relationship, and scrutiny. Only communities, churches, and local bodies can provide that.

The problem isn’t that they give money to people who need it. The problem is that it is done without personal verification, without moral evaluation, and without any proper understanding of responsibility.

Waste, Fraud, and Abuse

The SNAP quality-control audits for FY 2024 reveal a payment error rate above 10%. In a program of this size, that translates into billions in misdirected or incorrect funds.

“How much, precisely?”
If the FY 2023 SNAP outlays exceeded $120 billion, with a 10% error rate, it means more than $12 billion in payments were incorrect or should never have occurred. That’s not minor. That is a leak the size of a national department.

GAO and USDA both list improper payments as a major, persistent failure.

Fraud is part of it, but far from all of it. Much of the waste exists because bureaucracies cannot keep up with reality. Job changes, income fluctuations, and family shifts outpace the paperwork. A system this big produces exactly what you would expect.

Incentive Effects: The System Trains People to Do Less

Economists have studied this for decades, and the results are consistent. Guaranteed benefits, regardless of effort, reduce the incentive to work. SNAP’s own studies confirm this:

• When benefits are tied to work activities, employment rises
• When benefits do not require any form of labor, training, or job search, employment falls.

This should not surprise anyone. The structure of the program reduces the need for able-bodied adults to work at all. The system invites passivity, and once passivity takes root, it is difficult to reverse.

Researchers have found that the longer an able-bodied adult remains on income support, the harder it becomes to re-enter the workforce. A man who no longer needs to work in order to eat eventually stops expecting himself to work. What begins as temporary support becomes a permanent replacement for labor.

This is exactly the danger Scripture warns about. Support that removes responsibility harms the person it claims to help. A system that cushions disobedience to the command to work is a system that works against human flourishing.

Modern Policy Mistakes: Blind Compassion and Ideological Cover

People brand those who demand accountability as “cruel,” as if concern for character were hatred for the poor. But compassion without standards is not mercy. It is moral negligence.

Worse still, modern welfare has wrapped itself in ideological clothing. Redistribution is presented as justice. State provision is presented as progress. In practice, the structure mirrors socialist and Marxist logic, characterized by centralized control, automatic redistribution, and the displacement of local authority.

It replaces community with bureaucracy, neighborly charity with faceless transfers, and personal duty with state intervention. It pays for all of this using taxes drawn from those who wake up early, labor hard, and carry the economic load.

This is not biblical compassion. It is a system designed to numb a man’s sense of duty and normalize reliance on the state.

A Biblical Alternative: Relational, Qualified Charity

Scripture does not support the blind distribution of aid. It distinguishes categories of need, establishes qualifications, sets processes, and ties help to responsibility.

The model in 1 Timothy 5 is instructive. Public support for widows was limited, scrutinized, and tied to character, reputation, and relational ties. That model protects dignity. It confronts idleness. It restrains the temptation toward long-term dependency.

When aid is relational and overseen by an accountable community, it preserves the dignity of the genuinely needy and prevents the slide into dependency.

Local ministries already do this. They verify need, provide temporary support, create work pathways, and connect aid with moral expectations. Research shows that charitable organizations often achieve better outcomes than bureaucracies, especially when aid is combined with training and supervision.

---

Conclusion

A system that cannot tell the poor from the idle will always drift toward injustice.
A system that rewards non-work will always grow dependency.
A system that treats moral categories as irrelevant will always contradict Scripture.

If modern welfare keeps expanding without accountability, the nation will continue to reap the predictable harvest: idleness subsidized, responsibility punished, and entire communities shaped by a system that drains duty from the human soul.

The data confirms it. History confirms it. Scripture has warned about it for centuries.